Logo

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 27.06.2025 02:20

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Why do people believe that global warming is man made?

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

The No. 1 Breakfast to Boost Heart Health, According Cardiologist - TODAY.com

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

RFK Jr. appoints 8 new members to CDC's vaccine advisory committee, including some critics of shots - ABC News

What’s next?

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Win a signed pink cycling jersey of Giro winner Simon Yates - Team Visma

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Just in the last 5 years:

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

‘Titan: The OceanGate Disaster’ Review: The Horrors of Hubris on Netflix - WSJ

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Why is evolution such a controversial topic?

Russia can stop this any time.

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Let’s just make it real clear:

Is Beauty of Joseon Sunscreen good for oily skin?

Thank you.

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Dopamine Neurons Map Future Rewards, Not Just Past Ones - Neuroscience News

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Dolorum fugit ut molestiae voluptatem minima non.